Hypocritical Incompetent Liars?

It feels as though An American Idiot has become an AIG blog.  Moments ago I was telling a friend, it is because AIG is a microcosm of what is going on in our economy.  On Sunday and Monday Senator Dodd and President Obama voiced strong outrage and feigned surprise over the bonuses being paid at AIG.  We, in Anytown, U.S.A., really were outraged and surprised, but the aforementioned were merely pretending.

It may seem rude to accuse them of lying but it seems to me I am granting them the benefit of the doubt in doing so, especially since Dodd has changed his story three times.  Furthermore, the alternative is to call them incompetent because the language of the stimulus bill granted permission to AIG and the other bailees to dole out millions in taxpayer funded bonuses, yet no one read the stimulus bill.  An entire essay could be written about why the bill was never read by Congress or the President.  In short, the bill was too verbose and too packed with crap.  This was by design, the architects did not want it to be read.

The President never actually said he was ignorant of the bonuses, he merely declared them “outrageous” and condemned them.  Why would someone who insisted on allowing the bonuses because he, “worried that the government would face numerous lawsuits without the new language.” Suddenly take the lead pitchfork and torch in the public lynching of AIG? (Again I underline my position that AIG should have been condemned.) Is this not hypocritical? By not defending his decision but rather attacking AIG, was he not lying about his position on the subject through omission?

Now let’s look at the Senator from Connecticut.  Chris Dodd (D-CT) is the Chairman of the Senate Banking Committee.  On Tuesday Dodd claimed he had nothing to do with the stimulus bill’s wording that allowed the bonuses.  Then on Wednesday he said, “I agreed reluctantly.  I was changing the amendment because others were insistent.”  (Later he identifies the others as being from Treasury.) But this story won’t die; instead it follows him like a hive of angry bees.  Today, Dodd tweaked his story a bit.  He insisted that Treasury officials misled him to believe that the changes in the wording were simply “technical and innocuous.”  Then in righteous indignation he added, “If I knew [the changes were] to protect (AIG’s) bonuses … I would have flatly rejected it.”  Come on, Mr. Dodd admit it, you bought the argument and thought the news would slip quietly under the radar.  Perhaps you did not realize how extravagant those bonuses would be.  (Although, all one needs to do is recall the big party AIG threw after getting the first bailout to know this company would waste the maximum amount of taxpayer money.)

No one has ever lost money underestimating the intelligence of the American people.

If the AIG scandal was Dodd’s only screw up I might be able to find it in me to forgive him.  As far back as 1997 there were reports of Dodd’s lack of ethics.  Surely no one recalls that Dodd took $133,000 in campaign contributions from the medical industry and then defended the industry from regulation to prevent unapproved uses of medical devices.  CNN points out his failure to fix Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae.  In fact, he agreed with Sen. Barney Frank (D-MA) in denying there was any problem there.  Finally, we see that he is under investigation for special low interest rates he received from Countrywide bank.  (Hmm, surely he wasn’t trading financial favors for political favors.  He’s never done that before!)

The sad point to all this is how politicians use events to further their own careers because they believe we are all idiots.  In fact, they are right more often than not.  Just look at what our elected officials have done and then won re-election.  Dodd is but one example.  Sen. Stevens (R-AK) was re-elected, Rep. Charles Diggs Jr. (D-MI) served time and was re-elected, same is true of Washington DC Mayor Marion Barry (D), and the list goes on.  So all Dodd has to do is be consistent, oh wait he hasn’t done that, no matter, his district is pwned (click it) by the Democrats.  Dodd has been consistently re-elected to office since 1975.  But it is nice to see him scared.

  1. “No one has ever lost money underestimating the intelligence of the American people.” P.T. Barnum You really should give credit for quotes, but I often remember the quote and not who said it too. or worse, I remember it and believe it my own thought! 🙂

    I do however disagree with the quote. Obama only won the election by 53% which means 47% of the voting Americans were smart enough to vote against him. Obama also got a lot on first time (and probably last time voters as well as some real shady business like thugs outside of polling places to make sure only the “right” people walked inside).

    Now this quote very much applies to Americans reelecting their Congressmen. Due to gerrymandering the House of Representatives DOES NOT represent the people. The Representatives represent special interest groups. These gerrymandered districts are “special interests” groups of the worst kind because they have the votes to keep these damned idiots in office. Votes are better than money as money has to be spent to “buy” votes, but when a Representative r=lives in a special interest groups district he has it made and can save his lobbyist-conferred cash. This lack of intelligence of people in small groups is evident when the Senators are compared to the Representatives in the states; here is where the intelligence of the people is evident. There are a few long term bad apple Senators but for the most part we can thank God for the Senate. If we want change in government it is not ethics rules but fixing the Congressional districts that needs to be done. Of course this will never happen. BB

    • Thanks for all the intelligent comments. I declined to credit the quote because it is not a quote, plus I was using it as a section heading. No one actually used those exact words (trust me I am a research addict even when it isn’t necessary.) The man who did say something closest resembling this was a journalist named, Henry Louis Mencken. The actual quote is inelegant and may account for the popular misquote. He said, “No one in this world has ever lost money by underestimating the intelligence of the great masses of the plain people. Nor has anyone ever lost public office thereby.”

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply or add your opinion

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: