Obama Flunked High School Civics
Bret Baier spars with the an Muhammed Ali-like President Obama
I’ve asked it before and I’m asking it again, why is it that anytime someone says, “let me be perfectly clear,” they proceed to be anything but. In the above interview, Obama reminded me of Muhammad Ali as he verbally danced like a butterfly around questions and attempted to sting like a bee by excoriating Baier for interrupting his long-winded attempts not to answer the questions.
The most amazing moment came, though, when the President flatly admitted that he doesn’t care how Congress passes the health bill as long as they do. President Obama told Bret Baier of Fox News, “I don’t spend a lot of time worrying about what the procedural rules are in the House or Senate. What I can tell you is that the vote that’s taken in the House will be a vote for health care reform. And if people vote yes, whatever form that takes, that is going to be a vote for health care reform. And I don’t think we should pretend otherwise.” In the parlance of the web, WTF?! So what is he saying? I believe he’s saying, it doesn’t matter how they pass it, as long as I get to use that new pen I bought for the signing. He sounds to me like someone who didn’t pay attention in civics class.
Slaughter House Rules
When I first heard talk of the so-called “Slaughter Solution” I scoffed. Really? Even Nancy Pelosi knows you cannot subvert the Constitution. Certainly, the President would refuse to sign an illegally passed law. I could not image any Administration openly supporting the passage of a law that had not been properly voted upon. The House and Senate bills are not the same bill. The Senate rewrote and substantially changed the House bill. According to tradition and my understanding of the Constitution the house must vote upon the Senate version of the bill.
As I listened to the debate I was heavily impacted by the Republican references to Article I, Section 7 of the U.S. Constitution. It was so obvious this tactic was unconstitutional. However, I notice the quoted text was always abbreviated (as indicated by ellipses.) The researcher I am, I decided to reread the Constitution. Wouldn’t it be ignorant to based my opinion on an excerpt? But hey, most Americans base their opinions on far less – ask any liberal and they tell you what they “feel” is right.
The Constitution Assumes Democracy
Unfortunately, this is where I piss off my conservative friends, but please keep reading, then research it and convince me I’m wrong or that there is a better Article upon which to base a Constitutional challenge.
Every Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a Law, be presented to the President of the United States; if he approve he shall sign it, but if not he shall return it, with his Objections to that House in which it shall have originated, who shall enter the Objections at large on their Journal, and proceed to reconsider it. If after such Reconsideration two thirds of that House shall agree to pass the Bill, it shall be sent, together with the Objections, to the other House, by which it shall likewise be reconsidered, and if approved by two thirds of that House, it shall become a Law. But in all such Cases the Votes of both Houses shall be determined by Yeas and Nays, and the Names of the Persons voting for and against the Bill shall be entered on the Journal of each House respectively. If any Bill shall not be returned by the President within ten Days (Sundays excepted) after it shall have been presented to him, the Same shall be a Law, in like Manner as if he had signed it, unless the Congress by their Adjournment prevent its Return, in which Case it shall not be a Law.
Every Order, Resolution, or Vote to which the Concurrence of the Senate and House of Representatives may be necessary (except on a question of Adjournment) shall be presented to the President of the United States; and before the Same shall take Effect, shall be approved by him, or being disapproved by him, shall be repassed by two thirds of the Senate and House of Representatives, according to the Rules and Limitations prescribed in the Case of a Bill.
This article appears to be talking primarily about overriding a Presidential veto. I reread the entire Constitution excluding amendments to find any clear language regarding bills where the Senate substantially changes a House bill. Clearly, over time Congress has established a long history of messing with bills and reconciling the versions into a new bill which is then passed by both houses. But such procedures are not specifically spelled out in the Constitution. It seems the details of how to originate a bill and pass a bill is largely left up to Congress. When it says, “Every bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a Law, be presented to the President of the United States,” it does not even mention their having voted on that bill.
Scary omission as we have always assumed they vote. Today, we have Congress run by ideologues, who comb through the Constitution looking for loopholes and what they can get away with. I believe the founding fathers took it for granted that common sense would rule Congressional procedure. They assumed any bill presented to the President was the same bill voted for by both houses of Congress, but the fact is, they forgot to spell it out for the idiots of the future. Oops.
The good news may be that the long-standing tradition of both houses voting on the same bill may sway the Supreme Court to nullify the health care law. The bad news is that Article I, Section 5 reads, “Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings…” and this will likely be the basis for Pelosi’s defense.
If Republicans were in the majority and the Slaughter Solution were even discussed, the press would be circling like sharks, insinuation dictatorship, ect. It might have even been nicknamed the “Final Solution.” Instead today we see editorials and sycophants in the MSM defending it and claiming it’s commonly done. To that I must exclaim, BULLSHIT.
This is an affront to American political tradition, democracy, and freedom. If we let them get away with this, there will be no bound to how far they will go the next time!
The Idiot quote of the Year
Comes from Nancy Pelosi.
“We have to pass the bill so you can find out what’s in it”